Q: Don't these verses indicate that Jesus' ministry was to go to the Northern tribes of Israel only, and not the Southern tribes?
The basic mistake with this view (and I consulted over 10
commentaries and Bible dictionaries on the Matthew passage to see if
I might be wrong) is in assuming that Israel always means the
Northern Kingdom and Judah means the Southern Kingdom. That sort of
strict nomenclature was not even adhered to during the Divided
Kingdom Era. And certainly, beginning with the Exile and continuing
through to New Testament times, Israel(ite), Judah (Judean, Jew),
Zion, etc. were terms used interchangeably to apply to all sons and
daughters of Jacob.
I will give just two examples of New
Testament usage since that is the context of Jesus' words. Hebrews
8:8 quotes from Jeremiah 31:31-34 and talks about a covenant with the
House of Israel and the House of Judah. But this same covenant
becomes one with the House of Israel in 8:10, and then in 10:16 the
same quote is shortened to "them" in the context of Temple
worship taking place in Judea. The only way to avoid an obvious
discrepancy here is to consider that all three references to the
Jeremiah passage refer to the whole Jewish people.
Another
case where "House of Israel" appears in the New Testament
is during Peter's sermon on the Day of Pentacost. He addresses his
audience as "men of Judea and all who live in Jerusalem."
Then he calls them "fellow Israelites" in 2:29 and "the
entire house of Israel" in 2:36.
Some feel that only
Israel, and not Judah, was divorced by God in Isaiah 50. However,
nowhere in that chapter does it mention that the Northern Kingdom is
being exclusively addressed. In fact, both the previous chapter and
the following one seem to be addressed primarily to the Southern
Kingdom or to all Jews: see 49:6 "tribes of Judah" in
poetic parallelism to "survivors of Israel" and the
references to Zion (the mount of Jerusalem in Judea) in Isaiah 49:15;
51:3,11,16.
Yes, Jesus did spend much of his ministry in
Galilee, but there was also a Perean ministry as well as forays into
Gentile territory where he did miracles. The reason for staying
mainly in the northern areas has usually been described as a
practical one. If he had spent too much time close to the Jewish
authorities in Jerusalem, opposition from that quarter or from Roman
authorities would have clamped down on his ministry way before his
three years were up. This concern is especially seen in Mark's Gospel
where Jesus warns people several times not to spread the word of his
miraculous deeds.
The Matthew 10:5-6 passage basically means
that Jesus wants his followers to first preach to his fellow Jews
rather than the Gentiles. This same thought re-appears in Matthew
15:24, where Jesus heals the Canaanite woman's daughter. Of course,
in the final verses of Matthew's Gospel, Jesus broadens the scope of
spreading the Gospel to include all nations.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments