Colossians 2:8-23
I may talk around these verses rather than addressing them directly today. That is so we can concentrate
on a question found in our quarterly: “Would you be able to identify a false teaching about Jesus if you
heard one?” We can generalize that question to refer to discernment on any teachings on spiritual
subjects. One problem with those who have been attending a good church for years is that you may be
surrounded by very trustworthy sources (pastors and S.S. teachers) so that you can start to lose the
ability to weigh ideas for ourselves by going back to the source. Warning—I'm not one of those
trustworthy sources. This morning I will expose you to some ideas that are probably true, some that
may or may not be, and some that are definitely false. Put up your antennas and use your discernment
to decide for yourself whether these are from God or not.
False teaching comes from one basic source, Satan. And it usually manifests itself in one of two ways:
(1) misinterpreting or twisting the Scriptures themselves or
(2) relying on a source outside the Bible as authoritative. This seems to be the main problem with the
Colossians.
In approaching this book, one problem to face right off the bat is that the natural paragraph divisions
don't really match up with the chapter divisions in our modern Bibles. That is not a problem with the
inspiration of the Bible, merely a reflection on the archbishop of Canterbury in 1227 AD who came up
with those divisions.
Another problem comes from a perceived (1) lack of clear logical order to the book, (2) often a lack of
chronological progression, (3) unnecessary repetitions, and (4) taking up subjects, interrupting with
other material and then resuming subject. All of this has led to a THEORY of multiple sources, long
periods of time for its creation, and a series of editors.
Schools of form criticism, source criticism, historical criticism, literary criticism, linguistic criticism.
There is nothing wrong with the word criticism (it just means careful investigation). But these schools
of thought were driven by highly skeptical scholars using some very dubious assumptions, which leads
to destroying any credibility one might have in the Word as inspired. But some of the particular
phenomena they point out can't be denied.
About 25 years ago a trend began, especially among more conservative Bible scholars—schools of
thought known as canonical criticism or new literary criticism. They said, let's start with the Bible in
the form it is now and assume that a single intelligence is behind each book. Maybe the problem isn't
with the books themselves, but in our inability to fully understand how they were composed. The key
was the realization that a basic principle of all scripture is repetition. Important ideas and events are
almost never given just once, but usually are repeated, often in a very regular manner. As a simple
example, just consider Biblical poetry.
Here is one randomly chosen example:
The LORD will keep you from all evil;
He will keep your life. Ps. 121:7
Note that the same basic thought in the first line is repeated in the second line with minor variations.
And this same format appears throughout the Bible in even more complicated variations.
Here is one way to diagram the book of Colossians with the similar Roman numerals and indentation
indicating the presence of parallel thoughts and wording.
The Structure of Colossians
I. Opening Greetings (1:1-2)
II. Fruit of the Gospel and Prayer (1:3-14)
III. God the Reconciler (1:15-20)
IV. Our Holiness (1:21-23)
V. Christ in You (1:24-2:7)
VI. False Teachings (2:8-23)
V'. Raised with Christ (3:1-4)
IV'. The Old and New Natures (3:5-17)
III'. Transformed Relationships (3:18-4:1)
II'. Living the Christian Life in Prayer (4:2-6)
I'. Final Greetings (4:7-18)
Today's lesson (Section VI), with its warnings against false teachings, comprises the important, central composition in the letter, and is quite different in tone from the rest of the epistle. This section can itself be seen to possess a symmetry of its own.
Structure of Section VI
A. Christ vs. Elemental Spirits (2:8)
B. The Fullness of Christ (2:9-10)
C. Our Identification with Christ (2:11-12)
C'. Our Identification with Christ (2:13-14)
B'. The Fullness of Christ (2:15-19)
A'. Christ vs. Elemental Spirits (2:20-23)
In A and A', Paul takes potshots at:
Philosophy = intellectual Gentile exercises; Human tradition=Jewish traditions. In either case, human
ideas = not divine revelation.
There is an interesting Greek word (stoicheia) translated as “basic principles of the world” or
“elemental spirits.” Any other translations?:
(1) a basic element (Read 2 Peter 3:10—But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the
heavens will pass away with a loud noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fire..”). Therefore,
paying more attention to the creation rather than the creator.
Evil spirits or demons described in Gal. 4:8-9—“Formerly, when you did not
know God, you were enslaved to beings that by nature are not gods. Now,
however, that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God
how can you turn back again to the weak and beggarly elemental spirits?”
Stoicheia may also be translated as a first step, the ABC's. Thus, Paul may be
referring to the Old Testament laws and customs, which have been fulfilled or
superceded by Christ's coming.
Regarding vs. 23, we recently had the season of Lent, which many Christians observe. Does strict
observance of Lent curb the fleshly appetites if it is preceded every year by observance of Mardi Gras?
Sections B and B'
v. 9 “Fullness of the Deity” states that Jesus is wholly God while “bodily” indicates that he was wholly
man. Anything less than this is heresy. Interestingly, Jehovah Witnesses will say that Jesus is deity, but
not God.
v. 10 We are not divine like Christ, but our salvation in Him is lacking nothing.
------
v. 15 One aspect of Christ's work on the cross: disarming all the powers of evil.
Sections C and C'
vv. 11-12 This is the only place in the Bible where baptism and circumcision appear together, and they
are contrasted rather than equated (contra those who use the analogy of circumcision to teach infant
baptism). Inner circumcision by God who cuts out our old heart.
vv. 13-14 Second aspect of Christ's work on the cross: saving us from our sins.
vv. 14 Picture is one of an IOU being torn up.
But what about those who believe in other authoritative sources of spiritual truth outside the Bible. Let's
try an interesting exercise to help put yourself in the mindset of early Christians in the first century AD
who did not have a universally recognized canon of writings called the Bible. I will read a number of
passages from various sources, and I would like you to give me your comments regarding their
teachings. We will see if you have the gift of discernment.
Didache, The Teachings of the Twelve Apostles (100AD)
“Thus shall you baptize: baptize in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit in
running water. But if you do not have running water, then baptize in still water; and if you are not able
to baptize in cold water, then use warm water. But if you have neither, then pour water on the head
three times in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let
him that baptizes and him who is baptized and any others also who are able fast... for a day or two
beforehand.”
Gospel of Thomas (130-150AD)
“The harvest is indeed great, but the laborers are few, but pray the Lord to send laborers into the
harvest.”
(same as Luke 10:2)
“A city built upon a high mountain and fortified cannot fall, nor can it be hidden.”
(similar to Matt. 5:14b)
“This heaven shall pass away and the one above it shall pass away and the dead are not alive and the
living shall not die. In the days when you devoured the dead, you made it alive; when you come into
light, what will you do? On the day when you were one, you became two. But when you have
two, what will you do?” (not at all in the NT, similar to Gnostic teachings)
Psalm 151 (Arab version; This psalm is accepted by the Orthodox Church as being authentic) “I went
out to meet the Philistine, and he cursed me by his idols. In the strength of the LORD, I cast three
stones at him. I smote him in the forehead and felled him to the earth. But I drew his own sword and
beheaded him.” (Not in typical Hebrew poetic format, and contradicted by I Sam. 17—took five stones
but only threw one)
Infancy Gospel I (several from 2nd-5th Cent. AD)
And Joseph, wherever he went in the city, took the Lord Jesus with him, when he was sent for to make
gates, or milk pails or sieves or boxes. And as often as Joseph had anything in his work that needed to
be longer or shorter or wider or narrower, the Lord Jesus would stretch his hand toward it. And
immediately it became as Joseph wanted it. So that Joseph had no need to finish anything with his
hands, for he was not very skillful at his carpenter's trade. (total fabricated nonsense)
2 Esdras 6:42 (part of the Apocrypha, later excluded from the Catholic canon, 80-100AD)
Ezra praying to God, “On the third day you did command the waters to be gathered together in the
seventh part of the earth; six parts you did dry up and keep so that some of them might be planted and
cultivated and be of service before you.” Columbus used this passage in arguing to Ferdinand and
Isabella that the trip to India would be a short one.
Tobit (2nd cent. BC book in the Apocrypha referring to 7th cent. events) contains poltergeists and
magic potions.
Advice from the arch-angel Raphael: “Do good and evil shall not touch you. Better prayer with
sincerity, and almsgiving with righteousness, than wealth with wickedness... Almsgiving preserves a
man from death and wipes out all sin.” (12:8-9) This passage was used to justify the selling of
indulgences, which helped bring about the Reformation in Germany.
“These signs will accompany those who believe; by using my name they will cast out demons; they
will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes in their hands, and if they drink any deadly thing, it
will not hurt them.” Mark 16:17-18a These verses are not in the oldest copies of Mark's Gospel, see
modern translations.
Fourth Maccabees (80-120AD) : accepted by Greek Orthodox Church as part of the canon.
And when the guards said to him, “Consent to eat, so that you may be released from your tortures,” he
said to them, “Your method, O miserable minions, is not strong enough to lead captive my reason. Cut
off my limbs, and burn my flesh, and twist my joints; through all the torments I will show you that in
behalf of virtue the sons of the Hebrews alone are unconquerable.” As he thus spoke, they set hot coals
upon him besides, and intensifying the torture strained him yet tighter on the wheel. And all the wheel
was besmeared with his blood, and the heaped coals were quenched by the humours of his body
dropping down, and the rent flesh ran round the axles of the machine....he groaned not at all but nobly
endured the torment, saying: “Follow my example, O brothers. Do not desert me, and forswear not our
brotherhood in nobility of soul. War a holy and honorable warfare on behalf of righteousness, etc, etc.”
Jude 14-15 (from Book of Enoch)
See, the Lord is coming with ten thousands of his holy ones, to execute judgment on all, and to convict
everyone of all the deeds of ungodliness that they have committed in such an ungodly way, and of all
the harsh things that ungodly sinners have spoken against him. A non-canonical book is quoted in a NT
book. Does that mean that everything in that book is the truth? Read Enoch some time and decide for
yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments