Q: Why had God decided to kill Moses? I've never understood this. I did not see an
explanation given. Also, why did the circumcision of Moses' son change God's mind about killing him?
Brevard Childs: “Few texts contain more problems for the interpreter than these few verses which have
continued to baffle throughout the centuries.” “These verses are among the most difficult in the Book
of Exodus, not in terms of their translation...but in terms of their meaning and their location in this
particular context. (John I. Durham, Exodus, p. 56) Nevertheless, there is a general consensus that
Moses and/or his son had failed to be circumcised, in clear violation of God's explicit command in
Genesis 17:9-14.
“Before the establishment of a central sanctuary, circumcision served as the main symbol of God's
covenant with Israel and as a symbol, in turn, of Israel's commitment to keep the covenant.”
(Dictionary of Biblical Imagery, p. 179)
Renewal of this covenant was especially crucial at this point in history. “Compare the ceremonial
circumcision of the generation born in the desert, before embarkation on the 'holy war' against Canaan
(Joshua 5:7). Circumcision is a symbol of putting away all that is unpleasing to God, and of dedication
to God for the task ahead.” (R. Alan Cole, Exodus, pp. 78-79) Thus, “God attacks Moses [probably
through an illness] to prevent his attempting to carry out the divine commission while his household is
uncircumcised despite God's requirement for Israelites.” (NRSV Study Bible, p. 89).
Zipporah, a Midianite who appears to be more spiritually aware than her Jewish husband, remedies the
deficiency by circumcising her son (and vicariously Moses also), thus averting God's just wrath.
Three other commentators may be cited who attempt to deal with this difficult story.
1. Brevard Childs: The child was circumcised by his mother because Moses did not do so. The foreskin
was touched to the feet of the child (not Moses) to demonstrate that the circumcision was
accomplished. The story is meant to stress the importance of circumcision for the people of Israel.
2. Walter Kaiser Jr.: Moses had neglected to perform the rite, perhaps in deference to his wife. God
attacked him physically and his wife saved him by performing it herself. However, she gave Moses the
foreskin and said “You are a bridegroom of blood to me” to indicate her disgust at the act.
3. John Durham: God attacked Moses because he had not been circumcised. Zipporah circumcised their
son in his place instead because Moses otherwise would have been incapacitated and incapable of
leading the people. By putting the foreskin on Moses' genitals, she was making this vicarious act
obvious. Her phrase “bridegroom of blood” was an ancient formula used by her people, who practiced
circumcision as a premarital rite.
4. Ronald B. Allen (Bibliotheca Sacra 153, pp. 259-269): Moses had an unpleasant close encounter with
Yahweh (not described in the text) and was still feeling its effects. Yahweh was struggling with Moses
but did not want to actually kill him. Any uncircumcised male was to be cut off from the people of God,
and Moses needed to show obedience within his own family. He hadn't out of respect for his Midian
wife's feelings. (There are hints of this in Genesis 4:25 indicating that an earlier child of Moses had in
fact been circumcised.) After Zipporah completes the rite she angrily addresses the phrase “bloody
bride-father” to God. At that point, God releases the grip he had on Moses (similar to Jacob wrestling
with God or his angel).
Two comments concerning the placement of this strange story in its present location:
Moses has just finished expressing his fears to God concerning Pharaoh's response
However, “it is the wrath of God (not Pharaoh) from which man needs protection.”
(New Bible Commentary, p. 124)
There is also a foreshadowing of how events will end up. “Zipporah's quick action
and the application of the blood of circumcision save Moses' life at the beginning of
the story, as the blood of the passover will save all Israel at the end.” (NRSV Study
Bible, p. 89)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments